In the early hours ot 19 July 2003 a mother of three was walking home in a rural part of Salford. She was assaulted, strangled until she was unconscious and raped.
Andrew Malkinson had been stopped by police in the area some time before the assault.
Greater Manchester Police officers found two witnesses, a couple, who identified Malkinson as having been in the area around the time of the assault. Both had convictions for dishonesty. The female witness originally failed to identify Malkinson from a video ID parade, but changed her mind. Her boyfriend only identified Malkinson six months after the incident. Shortly after he identified Malkinson several charges against him were dropped.
The victim had told police she had scratched her attacker’s face. Malkinson had no scratch marks when he was picked up by police.
Malkinson was convicted in 2004 on the basis of identification evidence.
In 2007 Operation Cube was launched by the police, reviewing cases and convictions using recently developed DNA techniques. The Malkinson case was reviewed and DNA evidence of saliva on the victim’s vest (from an area near where she had been bitten) was found of another male. The DNA from that sample did not match Malkinson. Partial evidence of the DNA from another, as yet unidentified man, not Malkinson, was also found in tissues found on a speculum used during an internal examination of the victim. The DNA evidence was reported to be ‘searchable’, meaning it could have been run through the police DNA database to identify any matches or close matches which might lead to the identification of the male. GMP did not conduct a DNA search.
The vest the victim had been wearing at the time of the rape was destroyed in 2016, although it was known Malkinson still denied his guilt. The DNA testing that exonerated Malkinson was only possible because cut-out samples of fabric had been stored separately.
It was not until 2022 when the charity Appeal was able to get the Criminal Cases Review Commission to run a database check that another potential suspect was identified, Paul Quinn. Quinn had been cautioned for a sexual assault when he was 12 years old. In 1992 he was also convicted for a sexual assault occasioning actual bodily harm.
Some of the police officers who investigated the rape are currently the subject of an IOPC investigation.



